Archives For Product Reviews

The Nike Romaleos 2 weightlifting shoes are one of the best investments I’ve made when it comes to training gear.

It gave me an immediate performance enhancement in the squat, allowing me to easily hit ATG depth and feel rock solid and stable as if my feet were glued to the floor.

This enabled me to break 4 personal records in the past 5 weeks; on March 9, March 16, March 23 and April 6, 2012. (Note: Since the time of writing, I have hit many PR's in these shoes, which can be found on my "personal records" page)

It’s safe to say that the Romaleos 2 are responsible for making an impact on my recent squat numbers.

Here’s my review of the Nike Romaleos 2 weightlifting shoe:

Review

Mark Rippetoe wrote (in Starting Strength 2nd Edition, p. 61):

Mark RippetoeWeightlifting shoes are the most important personal equipment a lifter can own.

They provide solid contact with the floor and eliminate sole compressibility and the instability of squishy footing.

Get a pair. It will be the best money you spend on your training gear.

I wish I had taken this advice more seriously and invested in a pair of weightlifting shoes right from the start.

I first started squatting and deadlifting with New Balance shoes. It always felt uncomfortable and unstable in these shoes, almost like squatting on a stiff bed. So after reading some shoe recommendations for weight training I purchased the economical, often-used, and way-to-narrow-for-my-wide-feet Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars.

After all, it seems like almost everyone at Westside Barbell uses these shoes, so if it’s good enough for those modern-day Vikings squatting 1000+lbs, it should be good enough for me.

Well, over a year has past since I started wearing those good ol’ Chuck Taylors. It felt more solid than those New Balance shoes, but I could always feel a bit of instability as I performed my lifts. Watching a few videos of myself squatting confirmed this.

I’ve read how other people have switched to wearing weightlifting shoes, and how that made a world of difference when it comes squatting.

I figured I was due for an upgrade, so I began to research on what was the best weightlifting shoe to replace my Converse Chuck Taylors.

Nike Romaloes 2 Vs. Adidas AdiPOWER Vs. 2012 Rogue Do-Win

I was debating about whether I should get the Nike Romaleos 2, Adidas AdiPOWER or the 2012 Rogue Do-Win weightlifting shoes.

2012-Rogue-Do-Win-Weightlifting-Shoes

I have wide feet, and have read that the Do-Win shoes accommodate those with a less than slender foot. It’s the cheapest of the bunch, and have read many good reviews about the Do-Wins. But looking at the pictures of the Do-Wins on Rogue’s website, it doesn’t look as well constructed as the Nike Romaleos 2 or the AdiPower weightlifting shoes.

Adidas-AdiPOWER-Weightlifting-Shoe

For the Adidas AdiPOWER, while they look nice in red, I’ve read that they were on the narrow side, so they were out of the question. It also has one metatarsal strap compared to the Rogue Do-Win and the Romaleos 2 which both have 2. I would prefer 2 straps to make it easy and convenient to secure my foot in the shoe.

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes

From my online research, the Nike Romaleos 2 would be more suitable to accommodate my wide feet compared with the AdiPower, and looked very well constructed. Just like the Rogue Do-Win, it has 2 metatarsal straps, but in opposite direction. Apparently this secures the foot more firmly in the shoe. In the end, mostly because of width, I ordered the Romaleos 2.

First Impressions

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-01

When the Purolator mailman arrived at my door, he told me that he thought the package he was holding was probably shoes, but it felt a little heavy.

He was right.

Holding the box, it felt like I was carrying a pair of heavy steel toe boots.

When I opened the package, I feasted my eyes on a pair of shoes that would help me break a few personal records in the squat over the course of the next few weeks.

True To Size

I normally wear a size 10 US, and I’ve read that the Romaleos 2 run true to Nike shoe sizing. I didn’t have a pair of Nike shoes to try out, so I searched the internet and found a picture comparing a New Balance shoe and a Nike shoe of the same size.

I can’t find the original picture, but the New Balance shoe seem to be a little bit bigger than the Nike. I’ve also read other people saying the same thing.

I figured that since I wear a size 10 New Balance shoe, and size 10 Nike shoe SHOULD fit.

I’m glad it did, because I really did not want to deal with the hassle of exchanging these shoes for another size!

Take a look at the pictures below to see a comparison of a size 10 Nike Romaleos 2 with a size 10 New Balance shoe, size 8 Converse Chuck Taylors, and for good measure, a size 10 Rockport dress shoe:

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-23

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-25

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-24

Soles

One thing I really like, and what adds to the feeling of stability while lifting in the Romaleos 2 is the width of the soles. It's wider compared to the Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars, and very stiff. I can easily bend the soles of the Chuck Taylor shoes, but I can hardly bend the Romaleos 2 by apply a bit of force.

Take a look at the comparison pictures below and see for yourself:

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-17

 
 Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-21Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-22
 

Heel

The heel height is 0.75 inches.

From the product description on Rogue’s website:

“The most revolutionary innovation in the Nike Romaleos weightlifting shoe is Nike’s exclusive “Power Bridge,” a contoured TPU heel wedge designed to support the foot and bear as much weight as a man can lift, without any compression or give.

This technology provides a lightweight alternative to the wooden heel wedge that competitors have been using since the 1960s.

The Power Bridge is also a technical advancement because, unlike a flat wood shim, it is contoured to cup the heel, providing stability and comfort under stress. “

In other words, unlike most shoes where the heel is at the bottom of the shoe, the Romaleos 2’s heel wraps around the back of the shoe.

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-16

Insoles

The Nike Romaleos 2 came packaged with 2 insoles, pictured below:

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-08

Nike-Romaleos-2-Weightlifting-Shoes-13

“The Nike Romaleos comes with two different sockliners: a softer insert for training and a harder version for competition, when athletes benefit most from zero deflection as power is transferred through the foot.”

The flat ones are for training purposes, and the more contoured insoles are for competition.

I’m of the philosophy that training should mimic competition as closely as possible, so with this in mind, I’m currently wearing the “competition” insoles while I lift. And because it’s contoured compared to the flat training insoles, my foot doesn’t move around as much inside of the shoe.

Experiences

I got these shoes about a month ago. In order to give a well opinionated review I wanted to wear them during my workouts for a few weeks.

The first thing I noticed when I put them on and started walking around is how immobile I felt, and how heavy the shoes were.

It feels as though I’m walking around like Frankenstein, and it sounds like I’m walking around in high heels.

Note: I don't do do any Olympic style lifts like the clean, clean and jerk, snatch etc. so I can't give my opinion on how these shoes perform during those lifts. But here are my experiences wearing the Romaleos 2 while performing the squat, overhead press (power cleaned into position), bench press and deadlifts:

Squat

As I mentioned before, it’s easier to squat deep wearing the Nike Romaleos 2 compared to Converse Chuck Taylors.

So far, I’ve set 4 personal records in the squat since wearing these shoes to train.

It’s also very stable, making me feel like I’m glued to the floor. There’s no rocking side to side or back and forth movement while I lift.

Now, either because of the weight of the shoe or the flatness of the soles, or both, it seems a lot more difficult to adjust my feet when I prepare to squat. It takes a lot more effort to pivot on my heel and rotate the toes slightly out after I un-rack the bar. I had no problems with adjusting my foot position with the Converse Chuck Taylors.

But this issue is really not so bad, because it has taught me to step into a position where I am ready to squat without having to adjust my feet. Also, it goes to show how stable these shoes really are.

Also, performing the squat is different compared to the Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars.

Since the heel is elevated on the Romaleos 2, hitting a below parallel, ass-to-grass squat is way easier. However, the elevated heel tends to shift my body towards my toes during a squat, especially at loads near my 1RM or the last few reps of a heavy set.

Because of this, sometimes the bar movement doesn’t go up and down in a straight line.

Watch the video below to see what I mean:

Now, because of the elevated heel, even though it makes it easier to squat below parallel, I need to make conscious effort to shift my hips back in order to keep the bar moving up and down in a straight line.

Overhead Press

Compared to the Chuck Taylors, I find myself rarely needing to take a step backwards or forward when pressing an heavy barbell over my head. It’s easier to balance the barbell overhead, allowing me to focus on pressing the weight up. It really feels as though my feet are glued to the floor.

Also, unless I’m going for a 1RM, I power clean the bar before OHP. The initial power clean feels as though my feet are landing flat on the floor, which sets me up perfectly for the overhead press.

Bench Press

I’m using the Rogue Flat Utility Bench (review here) during bench press. The height of that bench is 18”, which is a bit high for me, so I use a pair of 35lbs plates on either end of the bench to allow me to get proper footing.

The 0.75” heels of the Nike Romaleos 2 makes it a little bit easier for me to place my feet flat on 35lbs plates. But I really don’t feel a difference benching with the Romaleos 2 compared to the Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars. I normally wear the Romaloes 2 because I perform bench presses after squats, and changing shoes for something that doesn’t make a difference would be a hassle.

Deadlifts

Deadlifting in the Nike Romaleos 2 makes me feels more stable, probably because of the super hard and flat soles. The 0.75” heel makes it seem like a smell deficit deadlift. But because of the elevated heel, deadlifting feels a little different compared to deadlifting in the Chuck Taylors (where the soles are a uniform height) or wearing no shoes at all.

I’m probably just going to use the Nike Romaleos 2 for squatting, overhead press and bench press, and wear the Converse Chuck Taylors for deadlifts.

What I Don’t Like

COLORS. Or lack of it.

The Romaleos 2 are black.

I like black. Batman wears black. Darth Vader wears black. Black is awesome.

And on a totally unrelated note, check out how freakin’ awesome this picture is:

darth-knight

Anyways, Rogue Fitness only sells black Romaleos 2. I’ve seen a white version of them floating on the internet, but I’m not sure where to get them.

I’ve seen some pictures of the first generation of Nike Romaleos, and they look SWEET in different colors.

Take a look below at the various colors of the Nike Romaleos 1:

Romaleos-ChinaNike-Romaleo-Colors

Romaleos-1-Red-heelromaleos-greenRomaleos-Red-China

Romaleos-1-white

Since the Romaleos 1 are now discontinued, the only place to find them in different colors are probably on forums, or eBay.

For convenience, I've included the latest listings for "Romaleos" from eBay below. If you're lucky, you might be able to score one of the Nike Romaloes in a color other than black!

CURL error code = 6. (Could not resolve host: rest.ebay.com)

I wished the Romaloes 2 came in different colors, or even better, have the option to customize the colors.

But in the end, when there’s a heavy ass barbell on your back, the color of your shoes doesn’t matter.

UPDATE

The Nike Romaleos 2 are now available in highlighter neon yellow.

They're called the "Nike Romaleos 2 Volt" and they look pretty nice! Definitely a head turner at the gym.

Nike Romaleos 2 Volt

UPDATE #2

They're now available in RED!

These look similar to the China Romaleos 1 (pictured earlier), but without the stars, Chinese writing and the 08-08-08 on the back. Also, the buckle on these red Romaleos 2 are gold. Now I need to come up with a reason to get another pair of weight lifting shoes...HMM...

Red Nike Romaleos2

Red Nike Romaleos2...sweet!

UPDATE #3

Now they have white & red, black & red, and white & black Nike Romaleos 2!

White & Red Nike Romaleos 2 Weightlifting Shoes

White & Red Nike Romaleos 2 Weightlifting Shoes

Black and Red Nike Romaleos 2

Black and Red Nike Romaleos 2

White & Black Nike Romaleos 2

White & Black Nike Romaleos 2

Overall

I have to admit, $200 is a lot to spend on a pair of shoes.

But then again, I’ve spend thousands of dollars on shitty shoes that have long passed away. I’ve also spend thousands of dollars on bodybuilding supplements that did not produce the immediate performance enhancing effects like the Romaleos did.

Since I’m only using these shoes 3 times per week to squat, bench press, overhead press, and the occasional power clean, the Nike Romaleos 2 will likely last a long time. And I'll be lifting weights until I'm dead, so I'll be using these shoes for many years. The cost per use over time will be low.

If you’re wearing Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars or another non-weightlifting shoe to squat, and you’re looking for something that will make an immediate impact on your technique, squat numbers and give you a rock solid, ass-to-grass squat, I recommend you check out the Nike Romaleos 2.

And if my review wasn't enough to convince you, read what other people had to say about their experience with the Nike Romaleos 2 here (under the tab "Reviews").

I already own a flat bench (Amstaff) but I’ve recently acquired a used Rogue Flat Utility Bench from Kijiji (eBay’s version of Craigslist) for a mere 50 bucks...delivered!

I got it last Saturday, but wanted to use it for this week’s workout before publishing a review on this beast of a bench. On Monday I did bench press 5x5 (Texas Method volume day) and a broke a bench press personal record on Friday (Texas Method intensity day).

A brand new Rogue Flat Utility Bench is regularly priced at $175 USD. But since I’m Canadian, the Canadian price is $207.05 CDN (not including shipping). So the used Rogue bench for $50 (shipped) is a little over $150 off the regular price.

Not a bad deal!

Since it was over 75% off the regular price, and the seller was willing to deliver it to me at no additional cost, it was an offer I couldn’t refuse.

Besides being covered with some chalk finger prints, having an imprint of the back of the head on the bench (which for some reason I can’t seem to get rid of) and sporting some spiderwebs on the underside, the only real issue with this bench was that there was a minor tear in the front end, which is probably the main reason why it was selling so low.

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-06

But the way I see it, it’s a minor aesthetic issue. The tear is barely noticeable (especially if I’m focused on pushing 300lbs+ off my chest, in this case my eyes will be looking up towards the ceiling), and won’t affect the function of the bench at all. I do have some concerns with the fabric ripping even more, which I’ll address below.

The first impressions I got when lining up this bench side-by-side to my Amstaff flat bench is that the Rogue bench is a monster. Take a look and see for yourself:

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-07

When I first started shopping around for a bench, I wanted something that would conform to the IPF (International Powerlifting Federation) specifications, just in case I start competing seriously.

From the IPF rulebook:

IPF Bench Specifications

  1. Length - not less than 1.22 m (~48 inches) and shall be flat and level.
  2. Width - not less than 29 cm (~11.4 inches) and not exceeding 32 cm (~12.6 inches).
  3. Height - not less than 42 cm (16.5 inches) and not exceeding 45 cm (17.7 inches) measured from the floor to the top of the padded surface of the bench without it being depressed or compacted.

It looks as though the Rogue flat bench is a little to tall to fit the IPF bench specifications.

Here are the dimensions of the bench that I have been using, along with the Rogue flat bench:

Amstaff Bench Dimensions (My current bench)

  1. Length: 43 1/4” (too short for IPF bench specifications)
  2. Width: 10” (too thin for IPF bench specifications)
  3. Height: 16” (too short for IPF bench specifications)

Rogue Flat Utility Bench Dimensions

  1. Length: 47.5”
  2. Width: 12”
  3. Height: 18” (too tall for IPF specifications)

More On Specifications

The dimensions of the bench shown on Rogue’s website are incorrect.

It lists the bench as 17.5” tall (which would fit into the IPF specifications), but in reality it’s 18” to the top of the bench pad.

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-10

With a width of 12”, the Rogue Flat Utility bench is a lot wider than my Amstaff bench (which is 10” wide). I feel a lot more stable while benching on the Rogue flat bench compared to the thinner 10” wide bench.

Pictured below is the width, and that back-of-the-head imprint on the bench I can’t remove:

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-13

Using The Rogue Flat Bench

This is 18” high, which is quite tall. Especially for a vertically challenged lifter such as myself, towering at a height of 5’4” (or 163cm).

That’s 2” taller than my Amstaff bench.

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-12

At my height, I can still place my feet flat on the ground on an 18” high bench, but I find myself having to stretch uncomfortably to establish firm footing.

On top of that, I find it a lot harder to utilize leg drive during bench press compared to the 16” Amstaff bench. I can’t even push my hips (or butt) off of the bench since I’m stretched out already. Using a pair of 35lbs plates (which are 1” thick) on both sides of the bench helps, eliminating some of the unnecessary stretch I need to do to place my feet on the ground.

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-01

Bench Press Height Affects Performance

While I was training at Columbia Lake Health Club last year for a few months, the height of the bench seemed taller than normal (the adjustable bench that goes along with the power racks). It was probably around 18” just like the Rouge flat bench. It may have been even taller. Using this taller bench, I recall not being able to utilize leg drive during the bench press.

In fact, looking back at my training log, during the time I was benching at CLHC and using the taller bench I was not making much progress. I didn’t even set a personal record while I was there.

This changed when I began training at home with a 16” tall bench, and more recently with the Rogue bench and 35lbs plates to elevate my footing. I even managed to set a new bench press PR of 327.5lbs on the Rogue bench.

Concerns

Feeling the sides and underside of the bench itself, I could see why the fabric ended up ripping.

It feels as though there is a large rectangular pad made of neoprene sitting on top of a smaller rectangular piece of wood. The fabric covers the top of the neoprene pad, and then folded under and stapled on the bottom piece of wood.

Because the neoprene padding and the wood is not the same dimension, the fabric travels diagonally from the neoprene pad towards the wooden part of the bench. This means there will be an empty gap in between the fabric and the where the neoprene pad and wood meets. See below:

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-diagram

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-02

This would make the bottom edge of the bench prone to damage, which would explain why this bench has a tear in the first place.

To move this bench, I would have to grab it on the underside (holding the wood portion of the bench) so that I don’t stress the fabric that’s in between the neoprene and wooden board.

Overall

Rogue-Flat-Utility-Bench-04

This bench would be perfect if it were 17.5” tall (as described on Rogue’s website) instead of 18”!

I will be using the Rogue flat bench instead of the Amstaff bench from now on. The bench pad dimensions (47.5”L x 12”W) fit within the IPF bench specification rules. However the height is just a tad bit too tall at 18”, but I can negate this height by placing plates under my feet while I bench.

If you’re not anal about dimensions, and/or you’re taller than me (5’4”), and you don’t mind the possibility of having to place plates or blocks under your feet to utilize leg drive, then this bench would be fine for you as an all purpose flat bench.

Also, I consider myself lucky for finding this for $50 on Kijiji. However I’m really not certain how often Rogue equipment is listed on classified ads, but if you’re lucky maybe you could find a deal on Kijiji or Craigslist. Keep in mind it probably would be in used condition and exhibit some wear and tear.

But if you want a brand new bench free of spiderwebs and sweat stains, check out Rogue Fitness.

In a globo gym (also known as a commercial gym), using chalk is typically not allowed.

Back when I was a member of a gym, I did not use chalk. So in order for me to perform deadlifts without my grip giving out or the bar slipping out of my hands, I decided to buy a pair of lifting straps. After all, I didn’t want my posterior chain to be held back from getting stronger because my grip was an issue.

In the past, I’ve used leather lifting straps and the weightlifting hooks, both made by Grizzly (this was a LONG time ago, when I was in high school). I went looking for them in my parent’s basement and found out that I was missing one of the leather straps, and the weightlifting hooks were in pretty bad shape (the fabric was ripped) so I decided to purchase a new pair of straps.

I came across a “dowel” lifting strap made by Schiek, the same company who makes those contoured weight lifting belts that are advertised in bodybuilding magazines.

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

I was also considering the straps made by Ironmind. Ironmind products are used in the World’s Strongest Man competitions, and I figured if it’s good enough for those metahumans/mutants/demi-gods deadlifting a freakin’ CAR for reps, it would be fine for me.

But the dowel on the Schiek strapped intrigued me, and I could imagine it working better than standard lifting straps, so I went with those instead.

Difference between Dowel and Standard Lifting Straps

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

For one, the strap itself is shorter. It’s only 6" long and made of nylon and acrylic. The reason why it’s so short is because with a dowel lifting strap, you don’t need to wrap the strap around the bar multiple times. You only need to wrap it once, and then lock the dowel down with your hand.

Secondly, there is a dowel. This is made of rubber and is attached to the end of the strap. It’s wedged between the hand and the bar to establish a secure grip.

Lastly are the neoprene wrist supports. It’s comfortable! They are 1/4" thick and 2-1/2" wide, meaning that these straps won’t dig into your wrists and leaving marks while pulling heavy weights.

How To Wrap The Bar

I’ve read people complain that the strap is too short. While it is shorter than most lifting straps I’ve seen, it’s a perfect length for an Olympic bar.

I’m guessing the people who find these straps too short do not know how to wrap the bar properly.

It takes a little getting used to at first, but once you get the hang of it, you don’t have to worry about the bar slipping out of your hands again.

Here’s how you wrap an Olympic bar with the Schiek dowel lifting straps:

1. Wrap it around the underside of the bar

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

2. Bring it up and around the bar

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

3. Use the side of your hand to pin the dowel

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

4. Finally grip the Olympic bar with your thumb.

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

Here’s what it looks like underneath. You can see that the heel of my palm (towards the thumb) is pinning the dowel against the bar.

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

If that STILL doesn’t make sense, here’s how it would look if the bar was invisible:

Schiek Dowel Lifting Straps

As long as you keep the dowel pinned, the bar won’t be slipping out of your hands.

With a little bit of practice and practice, this process can be done quickly and easily with one hand.

Use

So far, I’ve only used the Schiek dowel lifting straps for deadlifts. These straps have held up well to loads up to 500lbs (so far).

In the future I’ll be using them for heavy pulling movements such as rack pulls, high pulls, shrugs etc.

Pro’s

  • Dowel. Once the strap is wrapped around the bar and the dowel is locked in, your grip is secured.
  • Strap length. It appears as though the strap was designed to wrap around an Olympic bar once. There’s no time spent wrapping the bar multiple times with a long strap.
  • Made In The USA! Rule of thumb: if it’s made in the USA, the quality is probably going to be top notch.

Con’s

  • The length of the strap and the use of the dowel might take some getting used to, especially if you’re accustomed to the standard weight lifting straps.

Overall

These days, I deadlift with a hook grip and use chalk. But whenever I’m performing reps, I use straps. At 20 bucks the Schiek dowel lifting straps are the best straps I’ve come across. I got mine from BodyBuilding.com.

I don’t know how people can squat without collars.

If you’re like me, you might wobble out of the rack into position before squatting. When doing this, I find that if I don’t have barbell collars securely clamping down on the Olympic plates, those plates will start shifting from side to side.

When I was training at Fitness First Rama 3 in Bangkok, the sleeves on the barbells was smooth (in other words, there were no ridges), and the only collars available was those spring collar and the L-screw Olympic collars, pictured below:

screw oly collars

I normally used the screw style Olympic collars because they held tighter than the spring collars, but they would come loose on a regular basis, especially if I was lifting heavy weights, or performing deadlifts where I lower the weight back on the ground before doing another rep.

If I’m squatting a heavy weight, the plates would slide away from the center slightly and I would have to adjust the plates and tighten the collars in between sets.

One time, the plates on the right side of the bar shifted so much that it was half way from falling off!

While deadlifting, every time I completed the rep and put the barbell back on the floor, the plate would shift. Sometimes it would shift a little, but other times the collars would actually come loose, making the plates shift a few inches away from the center of the bar and I would have to stop, re-adjust the plates, tighten the collars and then continue with my set.

Needless to say, this constant readjusting of the plates and tightening of the collars was a pain in the ass, and added unnecessary friction to my workout.

I’ve tried doubling up on collars, but this wasn’t always possible because other people would be using them. Also, I didn’t want to be the jackass in the gym hogging half of the collars.

Also, it’s not entirely effective because during deadlifts, the plates will shift out of place even with 2 collars on each end of the bar.

Being fed up with this, I decided it was time to INVEST in my own barbell collars.

What Lead Me To The Ivanko COT-1.25 Barbell Collars

Ivanko COT-1.25 Olympic Barbell Collars
At the time, I was training in Bangkok and walked to the gym from my condo. Because of this, I wanted barbell collars that were not only super strong, but light enough so I wouldn’t sweat any more profusely than I already did in 30+C weather while carrying them around.

I did some research online and considered Olympic barbell collars such as Muscle Clamp and Lockjaw collars. They were light weight because they were made of plastic. But being made of plastic, I was concerned that it would not be as effective in holding a lot of weight as I wanted.

After seeing this video, my suspicions were confirmed.

Also, this video lead me to look at the Ivanko compression collars, which I ultimately ended up buying from Amazon.

Ivanko has a few types of compression collars, ranging from a massive 2.5kg (5.5lbs each) to 1.25lbs collars (totaling 2.5lbs). I went with the smaller version because it would be a lot more convenient carrying them around. And I believe they’re the ones shown in the video above.

At the time, they offered 2 versions of the COT 1.25 pressure ring collars. One was chrome plated, and the other was black oxide. Luckily I got the black oxide version (they look manlier) because Ivanko no longer manufactures that model.

How It Works

There’s a curved metal plate lining the inside of the collar called a “compression band”.

When you tighten the T-bolt, the compression band clamps down onto the bar.

Since the compression is distributed along compression band, it’s very tight and unlike other barbell collars (such as the L-screw collars where the screw digs into the bar), it doesn’t damage the bar.

Below is a picture of the Ivanko COT-1.25 collars untightened, and tightened:

Ivanko COT-1.25 Olympic Barbell Collars

What I Like

T-bolt collar. This makes it easy to spin from any direction.

I know the weight of my collars. They Ivanko compression collars weigh 1.25lbs each, so that’s 2.5lbs in total. With other collars, I’m not sure of the weight.

Extremely tight and secure. Weight plates don’t move, period.

Doesn’t damage the bar since the pressure is distributed throughout the interior ring.

Easy to tighten. I don’t need to apply much force to tighten the collars securely, compared to the L-screw collars.

What I Don’t Like

Prone to rust if not taken care of. I left these collars in a basement for a few weeks and it started to show some corrosion. This would not be an issue if I got the chrome plated version instead.

###

If you’re annoyed like I was where the barbell collars are not tight enough are coming loose during a heavy set, the Ivanko compression collars are a worthwhile investment. It certainly was for me, because I no longer had to adjust the plates and re-tighten the collars in between (and during) a set. My workouts were smoother, and I can focus on lifting the weight rather than if the barbell collars are coming loose or not.

While Ivanko doesn’t offer the black oxide version anymore (according to their website), I’m sure the chrome version of the Ivanko COT-1.25 works just as well, and is more resistant to corrosion.

They also have larger (and probably stronger) models of the compression collars. They are the COT-2.5 (which is a larger version of the COT-1.25), the CO-2.5KG and COC 2.5KG.

If you’re on a training protocol (such as Starting Strength, StrongLifts 5x5, or Texas Method to name a few) which instructs you to add weight to your lifts on a regular basis, then there will come a time when you WILL get stuck.

In other words, there will come a point where you cannot add any more weight to the bar, even though you can complete 3 sets of 5 reps (Starting Strength) at a particular weight.

This usually happens when you try to increase the load by 5lbs (and on lifts such as the overhead press or bench press, simply because there are less muscle groups involved in those exercises compared to the squat or deadlift).

The smallest Olympic plate at a gym is typically 2.5lbs. Adding 2.5lbs to both sides of an Olympic bar increases the load by 5lbs. What this means is even with the smallest possible weight available at a gym, it will be difficult to keep on progressing simply because 5lbs is too big of a jump.

To illustrate this, let’s imagine someone named “Bob” who can squat 200lbs, and overhead press 100lbs (both exercises for 3 sets of 5 reps). He’s on the Starting Strength training program, so linear progression (a fancy way of saying “adding weight every time you train”) is the name of the game.

For Bob’s next training session, his plan is to squat 205lbs and overhead press 105lbs.

The squat, going from 200lbs to 205lbs represents a 2% increase.

Whereas the overhead press, going from 100lbs to 105lbs would be a 5% increase.

Which do you think would be easier?

The 2% jump in weight for the squat will probably be manageable, however, a 5% jump for the overhead press would prove more challenging to achieve 3 sets of 5 reps. In fact, the extra 5lbs on the overhead press might be too much, and Bob might not even reach a set of 5 reps. He’ll hit a wall and plateau.

I’m sure this is a familiar story...I’ve experience the same situation myself many times (at different weights).

So how can Bob keep on progressing and continue to get stronger?

In my experience, there are 2 ways to keep on getting stronger (assuming that sleep, diet and recovery are fine):

First, is fight at the weight you’re stuck at until your can complete 3 sets of 5 reps (or whatever set/rep scheme the training program calls for).

What I used to do is use the weight I’m stuck at and work at it week after week until I could finish 3 sets of 5 reps. Sometimes this would take a few weeks; I would struggle at completing just 1 set of 5 reps, and maybe only hit 4 or 3 reps during the next 2 sets. After week or so, I would eventually hit my target of 3 sets of 5 reps. But here’s the thing: using the same weight over and over again really kills the momentum of getting stronger every training session.

The other solution is micro-loading with fractional plates.

Rogue Fractional Plates

Rogue-Fractional-Plates

At first I was hesitant to buy the fractional plates from Rogue Fitness simply because it was so damn expensive for such puny weights! ($65 for only a total of 5lbs of Olympic plates).

I’ve read people making homemade fractional plates from chains, but I decided on fractional plates from Rogue, simply because the cost of going to the hardware store to buy the chains, cost of the chains and buying a new kitchen scale to weigh these chains would cost more in time and effort.

These tiny weights have made a big impact on my training. Now, instead of trying to increase the weight by 5lbs, I can increase the load with as little as 0.50lbs.

There are 4 different plates:

  1. 0.25lbs x 2 = 0.50lbs
  2. 0.50lbs x 2 = 1.00lb
  3. 0.75lbs x 2 = 1.50lbs
  4. 1.00lb x 2 = 2lbs

I like the fact that I can go from 0.50lbs to 5.0lbs in half pound increments. I also like that each weight is represented by a different color (I’ve seen some fractional plates that are all one color - chrome).

Carrying Fractional Plates Around

Rogue-Fitness-Fractional-Plates

I used to take 2 sets of the Rogue fractional plates with me to the gym. At that point, I’ve found that I could still make progress by increasing the load by 2.5lbs (that’s 1.25lbs on each side of the bar), so I only brought half of the set with me: the 0.75lb red plates and the 0.50lbs blue plates.

An extra 2.5lbs in my gym bag wasn’t too much to ask.

I weaved the strap of my fanny pack inside the 2” holes of the fractional plates, and carried it over my shoulders. I probably got some weird looks (”why is that big short guy carrying baby weights?”), but I’m not interested in what other people think...I only want to get stronger!

Impact

Rogue-Fractional-Olympic-Plates

My goal is simply to get stronger, and microloading with fractional plates have helped me reach person records in all my lifts. After all, a 500.5lb deadlift is bigger than a 500lbs deadlift.

The Rogue fractional plates has helped the most with the overhead press and bench press, especially early on where a 5lbs increase became too big of a jump.

Psychologically I think it helps as well. Hitting a wall and getting stuck at a weight for weeks on end sucks. Especially when before it felt as though linear progression was going to happen forever (I wish!). Even adding 0.50lbs to the bar kept the momentum going and the belief that I am getting stronger...a little bit at a time.

What I Didn’t Like

What I didn’t like is that on some of these plates, somehow the paint has chipped off and the metal has show signs of rust.

RogueFractionalPlates1

RogueFractionalPlates2

I’m not sure how the paint chipped off, and I’m not sure if it’s even possible to prevent paint from coming off any weight lifting equipment for that matter since you’re banging metal on metal all the time, but the rusting is probably my fault, since I stored them in a humid basement.

In the future I may end up painting over this rust with some rust resistant paint from Tremclad or Rustoleum.

Overall

If you’re serious about getting stronger, then the Rogue Fractional Plates are among the best investments you can make. Tiny increment in weights as low as 0.50lbs will break plateaus, get unstuck and ensure that you’ll keep on progressing and keep on getting stronger.

At first glance it’s seems like a significant investment $65 for a total of 5lbs.

But if you’re like me and you’re pushing yourself to get stronger and break personal records, you’ll probably use fractional plates on every other workout (at least) for the rest of your life.

So $65 for something that will last years and get a lot of use over the course of your life is definitely a bargain.

Check it out here: Rogue Fractional Plates

Alternatively, there’s the Iron Woody fractional plates. The non-metric version is a bit cheaper than Rogue’s (probably because it’s not made of the anti-tank metal that Rogue uses), but I’m sure it’s just as effective.